Current:Home > FinanceThe White House is threatening the patents of high-priced drugs developed with taxpayer dollars-LoTradeCoin
The White House is threatening the patents of high-priced drugs developed with taxpayer dollars
View Date:2025-01-11 10:11:42
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration is putting pharmaceutical companies on notice, warning them that if the price of certain drugs is too high, the government might cancel their patent protection and allow rivals to make their own versions.
Under a plan announced Thursday, the government would consider overriding the patent for high-priced drugs that have been developed with the help of taxpayer money and letting competitors make them in hopes of driving down the cost.
In a 15-second video released to YouTube on Wednesday night, President Joe Biden promised the move would lower prices.
“Today, we’re taking a very important step toward ending price gouging so you don’t have to pay more for the medicine you need,” he said.
The administration did not immediately release details about how the process will work and how it will deem a drug costly enough to act. White House officials would not name drugs that might potentially be targeted.
There will be a 60-day public comment period. If the plan is enacted, drugmakers are almost certain to challenge it in court.
It’s the latest health policy pitch from a White House gearing up to make its efforts to tackle drug prices a central theme in next year’s reelection campaign. Biden frequently talks about the $35 cap on insulin for Medicare enrollees that went into effect this year, as well as a plan for government officials to negotiate some drug prices paid by Medicare for the first time in history.
The federal government, however, has never taken such a move against patents, a step called “march-in rights.” But some Democratic lawmakers, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, has in recent years lobbied the Health and Human Services agency to do so with certain drugs.
The conditions for how those “march-in rights” would be used have long been debated. Pharmaceutical companies have pushed back on the idea that prices alone are enough for Washington to act against a drug’s patent. The process proposed by the administration would clarify that the drug’s patent could be in jeopardy if its price is out of reach for Americans, White House officials said.
“For the first time, ever, the high price of that taxpayer-funded drug is a factor in determining that the drug is not accessible to the public on reasonable terms,” said Biden domestic policy adviser Neera Tanden.
The plan could threaten future drugs, according to the pharmaceutical lobbying firm Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA.
“This would be yet another loss for American patients who rely on public-private sector collaboration to advance new treatments and cures,” PhRMA spokesperson Megan Van Etten said.
Pharmaceutical companies have long relied on government research to develop new drugs. The most recent major breakthrough was the development of COVID-19 vaccines. U.S. taxpayers invested billions of dollars in the effort and were able, until recently, to access treatments and preventions for the virus without paying out-of-pocket for them.
When the public invests heavily in a private company’s drug, it’s fair to question whether they should have to pay high prices for it, said William Pierce, a former HHS official during President George W. Bush’s administration.
“The question becomes – what reward should there be for the taxpayers who help fund this product?” Pierce said.
veryGood! (37885)
Related
- Catholic bishops urged to boldly share church teachings — even unpopular ones
- Taylor Swift's Net Worth Revealed After Becoming a Billionaire
- Could Naturally Occurring Hydrogen Underground Be a Gusher of Clean Energy in Alaska?
- Supreme Court declines Biden’s appeal in Texas emergency abortion case
- Kevin Costner Shares His Honest Reaction to John Dutton's Controversial Fate on Yellowstone
- The Chilling Truth Behind Anna Kendrick's Woman of the Hour Trailer
- North Carolina farmers hit hard by historic Helene flooding: 'We just need help'
- Could Naturally Occurring Hydrogen Underground Be a Gusher of Clean Energy in Alaska?
- Surprise bids revive hope for offshore wind in Gulf of Mexico after feds cancel lease sale
- Milton to become a major hurricane Monday as it barrels toward Florida: Updates
Ranking
- Armie Hammer Says His Mom Gifted Him a Vasectomy for His 38th Birthday
- Judge rules the FTC can proceed with antitrust lawsuit against Amazon, tosses out few state claims
- South Korean woman sues government and adoption agency after her kidnapped daughter was sent abroad
- Alabama's stunning loss, Missouri's unmasking top college football Week 6 winners and losers
- 'Full House' star Dave Coulier diagnosed with stage 3 cancer
- More Black and Latina women are leading unions - and transforming how they work
- How did the Bills lose to Texans? Baffling time management decisions cost Buffalo
- Sean “Diddy” Combs’ Mom Janice Defends Him Against “Public Lynching” Amid Sexual Abuse Allegations
Recommendation
-
Nicky Hilton Shares Her Christmas Plans With Paris, the Secret To Perfect Skin & More Holiday Gift Picks
-
Kansas City small businesses thank Taylor Swift for economic boom: 'She changed our lives'
-
Opinion: Nick Saban asked important college football question, and Vanderbilt offers a loud answer
-
Donald Glover cancels Childish Gambino tour dates after recent surgery
-
How Alex Jones’ Infowars wound up in the hands of The Onion
-
Krispy Kreme scares up Ghostbusters doughnut collection: Here are the new flavors
-
Michigan gun owner gets more than 3 years in prison for accidental death of grandson
-
Texas still No. 1 in US LBM Coaches Poll but rest of college football top 10 gets reshuffling